Evaluation and Usability of Programming Languages and ToolsPLATEAU
The Fifth Workshop on Evaluation and Usability of Programming Languages and Tools (PLATEAU) at SPLASH 2014.
Programming languages exist to enable programmers to develop software effectively. But how efficiently programmers can write software depends on the usability of the languages and tools that they develop with. The aim of this workshop is to discuss methods, metrics and techniques for evaluating the usability of languages and language tools. The supposed benefits of such languages and tools cover a large space, including making programs easier to read, write, and maintain; allowing programmers to write more flexible and powerful programs; and restricting programs to make them more safe and secure.
PLATEAU gathers the intersection of researchers in the programming language, programming tool, and human-computer interaction communities to share their research and discuss the future of evaluation and usability of programming languages and tools.
Some particular areas of interest are:
- empirical studies of programming languages
- methodologies and philosophies behind language and tool evaluation
- software design metrics and their relations to the underlying language
- user studies of language features and software engineering tools
- visual techniques for understanding programming languages
- critical comparisons of programming paradigms
- tools to support evaluating programming languages
- psychology of programming
Download each paper by clicking on the event title in the program, pushing the “view event page” button, and clicking the file attachment link. We strongly encourage you to read the papers in advance of the workshop.
Tue 21 Oct
|08:30 - 09:00|
|09:00 - 10:00|
|10:30 - 10:52|
|10:52 - 11:15|
Christian DoernerSenacor Technologies AG, Andrew FaulringCarnegie Mellon University , Brad MyersCarnegie Mellon UniversityFile Attached
|11:15 - 11:37|
Empirical Comparison of Visual to Hybrid Formula Manipulation in Educational Programming Languages for Teenagers
Roxane KoitzGraz University of Technology, Wolfgang SlanyInstitute of Software Technology, Graz University of TechnologyFile Attached
|11:37 - 12:00|
Jean Michel RoulyGeorge Mason University, Jonathan OrbeckUniversity of Alabama, Eugene SyrianiUniversity of MontrealFile Attached
|13:30 - 13:55|
|13:55 - 14:10|
Joel GalensonUniversity of California, Berkeley and Qualcomm Research, Cindy Rubio-GonzalezUniversity of California, Berkeley, Sarah ChasinsUniversity of California, Berkeley, Liang GongUniversity of California, BerkeleyFile Attached
|14:10 - 14:25|
|14:25 - 15:00|
Stefan HanenbergUniversity of Duisburg-Essen
|15:30 - 15:52|
Darya MelicherCarnegie Mellon University, Alex PotaninVictoria University of Wellington, Jonathan AldrichCarnegie Mellon UniversityFile Attached
|15:52 - 16:15|
Michael CoblenzCarnegie Mellon University, Jonathan AldrichCarnegie Mellon University, Brad MyersCarnegie Mellon University, Joshua SunshineCarnegie Mellon UniversityFile Attached
|16:15 - 16:37|
|16:37 - 17:00|
Call for Submissions
Download PLATEAU Call For Submissions (515KB PDF Document)
Submission deadline extended! Submissions due Wed, August 13.
PLATEAU papers should be submitted via EasyChair. PLATEAU encourages submissions of three types of papers:
Research and position papers: We encourage papers that describe work-in-progress or recently completed work based on the themes and goals of the workshop or related topics, report on experiences gained, question accepted wisdom, raise challenging open problems, or propose speculative new approaches. We will accept two types of papers: research papers up to 8 pages in length; and position papers up to 2 pages in length.
Hypotheses papers: Hypotheses papers explicitly identify beliefs of the research community or software industry about how a programming language, programming language feature, or programming language tool affects programming practice. Hypotheses can be collected from mailing lists, blog posts, paper introductions, developer forums, or interviews. Papers should clearly document the source(s) of each hypothesis and discuss the importance, use, and relevance of the hypotheses on research or practice. Papers may also, but are not required to, review evidence for or against the hypotheses identified. Hypotheses papers can be up to 4 pages in length.
Page Limits: The page limits listed above are recommendations, not hard limits. Please be considerate of reviewers’ time and exceed the limits with care.
Format: Submissions should use the SIGPLAN Proceedings Format, 10 point font. Note that by default the SIGPLAN Proceedings Format produces papers in 9 point font. If you are formatting your paper using LaTeX, you will need to set the 10pt option in the \documentclass command. If you are formatting your paper using Word, you may wish to use the provided Word template that supports this font size. Please include page numbers in your submission. Setting the preprint option in the LaTeX \documentclass command generates page numbers. Please also ensure that your submission is legible when printed on a black and white printer. In particular, please check that colors remain distinct and font sizes are legible.
All types of papers will be published in the ACM Digital Library at the authors’ discretion.
Here is a download of all the papers as part of the PLATEAU Proceedings.
- PLATEAU 2014 Proceedings (ZIP File 2.8MB)